Welcome to Quantum Muse, a science fiction and fantasy ezine. Welcome to Quantum Muse, a science fiction and fantasy ezine. Your banner could be here! Find out how!
.
Posting the finest in science fiction, fantasy and alternative writing and artwork. For free. In our sober moments...
   Reader's login    |    Writer's login

Does Science Prove the Existence of God?

by

Gordon Rowlinson



                 

Throughout history, there have been many examples of science and religion being in conflict. In ancient Babylon, priests thought that lunar eclipses were evil omens that were directed against their king and meant that the king would die soon. A conflict arose when astronomers eventually calculated the 18 year, 11.3 day interval between lunar eclipses. However the scientific discovery did not impress the priests. When the next lunar eclipse was due, a temporary king was installed. After the priests killed the temporary king, the real king was put back in power.

 

During the Middle Ages, church authorities played a highly negative role in suppressing early scientific thought. In 1543, Nicolaus Copernicus published his model of the universe that placed the Sun, not the Earth, at the center of the universe. The Roman Inquisition declared the the idea as “formally heretical” and placed the book on the Index of forbidden books. When Galileo took up Copernicus's ideas, the Roman Catholic Inquisition found Galileo guilty of heresy and condemned the idea of the Earth revolving around the sun.

 

However, when there is no paranoid fear from the religious authorities, there is no tension between the two realms and, in recent years, science supports the idea of an existence of a God. Issac Newton is widely considered on of the greatest minds in history. During the 17 century, he labored trying to find a mathematical solution that would predict the workings of the solar system. His solution was the law of gravity. Newton thought it odd that distant objects in the solar system were drawn to one another, acting to a consistent mathematical law of gravity. After making efforts over his lifetime to find a natural explanation, he concluded “it is the will of God.”

 

In 1929 after Edwin Hubble proved that galaxies are expanding away from one another, Albert Einstein came to the conclusion of “the necessity for a beginning” and “the presence of a superior reasoning power.” Einstein thought that something was keeping the laws of the universe constant. “ Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.”

 

Of course the Bible states that God was responsible for the beginning.

 

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.  And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. Genesis 1:1-3

 

Einstein's view of God and “superior reasoning power” was not the God of the Bible. He did not view God as a personal God that would hand out rewards and punishment and judgment. “If this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every human action, every human though, and every human feeling and aspiration is also His work; how is it possible to think of holding men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty Being?”

 

In 1960, Nobel Prize winner, Eugene Wigner raised a question similar to Newton and Einstein: Why does the natural world always obey laws of mathematics? What is holding things together. In 2017, Robert Nelson answered this question in an article in Newsweek: “It takes the existence of some kind of a God to make the mathematical underpinnings of the universe comprehensible.”

 


Similar to the laws of mathematics, human consciousness is also a miraculous phenomenon. Like mathematics, consciousness has no physical presence in the world and the images and thoughts in our consciousness have no measurable dimensions. Yet, our nonphysical thoughts somehow guide the actions of our physical human bodies. As Nelson notes: “This is no more scientifically explicable than the mysterious ability of nonphysical mathematical constructions to determine the workings of a separate physical world.”

 

In 1993, Hugh Ross in “The Creator and the Cosmos” presents scientific proof of the levels of irregularity in the background radiation (as measured by the COBE Cosmic Background Explorer satellite) and the ratio of exotic matter to ordinary matter (as measured by the Keck and Hubble telescopes) as proof that the Big Bang theory was the start of the universe and time. He then makes the logical argument that God was the one who started the Big Bang and created the universe and that this God operates independent of the cosmos and it's four space-time dimensions of length, width, height and time. Logically if God created the universe and the four dimensions of time, length width and depth, then logically God exists outside of our dimensions and God existed before time started. This is what the Bible tells us:

 

No, we speak of God's secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. (1 Corinthians 2:7)

This grace was given us in Christ Jesus before the beginning of time (2 Timothy 1:9)

 

Ross then demonstrates how the big bang was not too hot or too cold but just right for the dispersion of materials needed to build the universe. In addition, he maintains that our solar system and our planet are uniquely designed to support life. It takes a certain kind of star with a planet located at just the right distance from that star to provide the minimal conditions for life. Less that 0.001% of all stars could have a planet capable of supporting advanced life. Ross argues that the galaxy, the sun, our solar system are part of divine design and are proof of a personal and caring God. “The recent measuring of the cosmos have revealed not only the existence of God but also His transcendence, His personality, and even His care and love for human beings.”

 

In addition, given how unique and rare our planet is, there may not be any extraterrestrial intelligence elsewhere in the universe or there is something out there, it is very rare. This is certainly bad news for science fiction fans and for the people who work and search for alien life at SETI. Alas, all our efforts to search for extraterrestrial intelligence may never find anything. What? No Vulcans or Klingons? Unfortunately the late Senator Proxmire may have said it best when he said, “We would be far wiser to spend money looking for intelligent life in Washington.”

 

It appears that science and religion do not have to be in conflict. Why should they be? Theology is about the creation of heaven and Earth. Science is the systematic study of that creation. Religious beliefs are a very personal thing. One person can see the elegant architecture of the universe, the galaxy, the sun and the planets, the Earth, the odd, diverse creatures that inhabit the Earth, as wisdom of a caring Creator. Others will see it all as an amazing coincidence. However one must admit that something started the big bang and created the universe. All the mass and the energy in the universe did not magically self-create from nothing into existence.

 

This article covers a lot of ground in a short space. If you would like to add to the discussion, your comments below are welcome.

 

Behold! The Quantum Muse presents this month's thought-provoking, inspirational Science Fiction stories that our brilliant writers have diligently labored over. Feel free to plunge in and enjoy these stories.

 

 


2018-07-27 12:35:39
Modelling_Mushi - @r.tornello Im starting to wonder, too much spam on other post pages so Id guess noones looking. You could be right.

2018-07-14 11:50:44
r.tornello - Has this ZINE gone down the tubes? Is there no captain at the helm?

Appears that any care and tending has hit the shit can.


2018-07-05 07:07:51
GordonRowlinson - I'm not a physicist, but I see no examples of spontaneous arising from nothing. I am reminded of the Thomas Aquinas's argument of God's existence. Nothing can cause itself, and an infinite chain of causation is impossible, so there must be a First Cause, called God. It is possible that something arising from nothing is happening all the time and we just don't perceive and realize it. We are limited to what we can perceive. Michelle and pniemeyer: I'm not a historian, but I agree with you on Einstein. I found the below thought provoking quotes on the internet: “The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.” “I see a pattern, but my imagination cannot picture the maker of that pattern. I see a clock, but I cannot envision the clockmaker. The human mind is unable to conceive of the four dimensions, so how can it conceive of a God, before whom a thousand years and a thousand dimensions are as one?”

2018-07-04 15:34:20
In my last comment I meant to say most scientists are NOT willing to take a leap of faith.

2018-07-03 04:33:16
The author says that Ross talks about how the Big Bang happened and then "makes the logical assumption that God" ...that is not logical. There is no logical this follows that in the above statement. 2 + 2 = 4 so 4 -2 = 2. THAT is a logical statement. Ross's god assumption is a leap of faith that the majority of scientists are willing to make.

2018-07-02 21:14:02
pniemeyer - Einstein was a pantheist, meaning that he believed that God and the universe are one and the same. He wasn't exactly an atheist, but he wasn't religious in any conventional sense.

2018-07-02 14:34:42
micheledutcher - According to Wikipedia Einstein did not believe in a personal God. He preferred to call himself an agnostic or a "religous nonbeliever".

2018-07-02 07:23:02
You all might want to get a copy of Rovelli's "The Order of Time".

btw did my last extended comment get censored?


2018-07-02 04:27:18
Modelling_Mushi - "However one must admit that something started the big bang and created the universe. All the mass and the energy in the universe did not magically self-create from nothing into existence." No. It has been shown (not proven, thats impossible) that this spontaneous arising from nothing is possible. Ex Nihlo is no reason to either beleive or not beleive in god.

2018-07-01 13:30:01
caring creator (s)? Those that think that have yet to read their holy books.





Please leave your comments. They will be stored permanently with interview.

Enter the code above to post comment:

comment:




We shamelessly accept handouts!

Give generously to the United Wa - uh, we mean Quantum Muse. It keeps Mike off the streets from scaring small children and the Web Goddess from spray painting Town Hall - again.
Enter your tip amount. Then click on the tip cup!


Quantum Museletter! Be the first to know when new stories and artwork have arrived.

Subscribe to Quantum Museletter by filling out the following form.



Enter the code above to verify entry:
Your email address:
Your name (optional):
 

Do you like this site?
Recommend it to a friend by pushing the button below!